• <blockquote id="a6oys"></blockquote>
  • <tt id="a6oys"></tt>
  • Paul's Online Notes
    Paul's Online Notes
    Home / Calculus III / Surface Integrals / Curl and Divergence
    Show General Notice Show Mobile Notice Show All Notes Hide All Notes
    General Notice

    I apologize for the outage on the site yesterday and today. Lamar University is in Beaumont Texas and Hurricane Laura came through here and caused a brief power outage at Lamar. Things should be up and running at this point and (hopefully) will stay that way, at least until the next hurricane comes through here which seems to happen about once every 10-15 years. Note that I wouldn't be too suprised if there are brief outages over the next couple of days as they work to get everything back up and running properly. I apologize for the inconvienence.

    August 27, 2020

    Mobile Notice
    You appear to be on a device with a "narrow" screen width (i.e. you are probably on a mobile phone). Due to the nature of the mathematics on this site it is best views in landscape mode. If your device is not in landscape mode many of the equations will run off the side of your device (should be able to scroll to see them) and some of the menu items will be cut off due to the narrow screen width.

    Section 6-1 : Curl and Divergence

    Before we can get into surface integrals we need to get some introductory material out of the way. That is the purpose of the first two sections of this chapter.

    In this section we are going to introduce the concepts of the curl and the divergence of a vector.

    Let’s start with the curl. Given the vector field \(\vec F = P\,\vec i + Q\,\vec j + R\,\vec k\) the curl is defined to be,

    \[{\mathop{\rm curl}\nolimits} \vec F = \left( {{R_y} - {Q_z}} \right)\vec i + \left( {{P_z} - {R_x}} \right)\vec j + \left( {{Q_x} - {P_y}} \right)\vec k\]

    There is another (potentially) easier definition of the curl of a vector field. To use it we will first need to define the \(\nabla \) operator. This is defined to be,

    \[\nabla = \frac{\partial }{{\partial x}}\,\,\vec i + \frac{\partial }{{\partial y}}\,\,\vec j + \frac{\partial }{{\partial z}}\,\,\vec k\]

    We use this as if it’s a function in the following manner.

    \[\nabla f = \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial x}}\,\,\vec i + \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial y}}\,\,\vec j + \frac{{\partial f}}{{\partial z}}\,\,\vec k\]

    So, whatever function is listed after the \(\nabla \) is substituted into the partial derivatives. Note as well that when we look at it in this light we simply get the gradient vector.

    Using the \(\nabla \) we can define the curl as the following cross product,

    \[{\mathop{\rm curl}\nolimits} \vec F = \nabla \times \vec F = \left| {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{\vec i}&{\vec j}&{\vec k}\\{\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{{\partial x}}}&{\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{{\partial y}}}&{\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{{\partial z}}}\\P&Q&R\end{array}} \right|\]

    We have a couple of nice facts that use the curl of a vector field.


    1. If \(f\left( {x,y,z} \right)\) has continuous second order partial derivatives then \({\mathop{\rm curl}\nolimits} \left( {\nabla f} \right) = \vec 0\). This is easy enough to check by plugging into the definition of the derivative so we’ll leave it to you to check.

    2. If \(\vec F\) is a conservative vector field then \({\mathop{\rm curl}\nolimits} \vec F = \vec 0\). This is a direct result of what it means to be a conservative vector field and the previous fact.

    3. If \(\vec F\) is defined on all of \({\mathbb{R}^3}\) whose components have continuous first order partial derivative and \({\mathop{\rm curl}\nolimits} \vec F = \vec 0\) then \(\vec F\) is a conservative vector field. This is not so easy to verify and so we won’t try.
    Example 1 Determine if \(\vec F = {x^2}y\,\vec i + xyz\,\vec j - {x^2}{y^2}\,\vec k\) is a conservative vector field.
    Show Solution

    So, all that we need to do is compute the curl and see if we get the zero vector or not.

    \[\begin{align*}{\mathop{\rm curl}\nolimits} \vec F & = \left| {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{\vec i}&{\vec j}&{\vec k}\\{\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{{\partial x}}}&{\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{{\partial y}}}&{\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{{\partial z}}}\\{{x^2}y}&{xyz}&{ - {x^2}{y^2}}\end{array}} \right|\\ & = - 2{x^2}y\,\vec i + yz\,\vec k - \left( { - 2x{y^2}\,\vec j} \right) - xy\,\vec i - {x^2}\vec k\\ & = - \left( {2{x^2}y + xy} \right)\vec i + 2x{y^2}\,\vec j + \left( {yz - {x^2}} \right)\vec k\\ & \ne \vec 0\end{align*}\]

    So, the curl isn’t the zero vector and so this vector field is not conservative.

    Next, we should talk about a physical interpretation of the curl. Suppose that \(\vec F\) is the velocity field of a flowing fluid. Then \({\mathop{\rm curl}\nolimits} \vec F\) represents the tendency of particles at the point \(\left( {x,y,z} \right)\) to rotate about the axis that points in the direction of \({\mathop{\rm curl}\nolimits} \vec F\). If \({\mathop{\rm curl}\nolimits} \vec F = \vec 0\) then the fluid is called irrotational.

    Let’s now talk about the second new concept in this section. Given the vector field \(\vec F = P\,\vec i + Q\,\vec j + R\,\vec k\) the divergence is defined to be,

    \[{\mathop{\rm div}\nolimits} \vec F = \frac{{\partial P}}{{\partial x}} + \frac{{\partial Q}}{{\partial y}} + \frac{{\partial R}}{{\partial z}}\]

    There is also a definition of the divergence in terms of the \(\nabla \) operator. The divergence can be defined in terms of the following dot product.

    \[{\mathop{\rm div}\nolimits} \vec F = \nabla \centerdot \vec F\]
    Example 2 Compute \({\mathop{\rm div}\nolimits} \vec F\) for \(\vec F = {x^2}y\,\vec i + xyz\,\vec j - {x^2}{y^2}\,\vec k\)
    Show Solution

    There really isn’t much to do here other than compute the divergence.

    \[{\mathop{\rm div}\nolimits} \vec F = \frac{\partial }{{\partial x}}\left( {{x^2}y} \right) + \frac{\partial }{{\partial y}}\left( {xyz} \right) + \frac{\partial }{{\partial z}}\left( { - {x^2}{y^2}} \right) = 2xy + xz\]

    We also have the following fact about the relationship between the curl and the divergence.

    \[{\mathop{\rm div}\nolimits} \left( {{\mathop{\rm curl}\nolimits} \vec F} \right) = 0\]

    Example 3 Verify the above fact for the vector field \(\vec F = y{z^2}\,\vec i + xy\,\vec j + yz\,\vec k\).
    Show Solution

    Let’s first compute the curl.

    \[\begin{align*}{\mathop{\rm curl}\nolimits} \vec F & = \left| {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}}{\vec i}&{\vec j}&{\vec k}\\{\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{{\partial x}}}&{\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{{\partial y}}}&{\displaystyle \frac{\partial }{{\partial z}}}\\{y{z^2}}&{xy}&{yz}\end{array}} \right|\\ & = z\,\vec i + 2yz\,\vec j + y\,\vec k - {z^2}\vec k\\ & = z\vec i + 2yz\,\vec j + \left( {y - {z^2}} \right)\vec k\end{align*}\]

    Now compute the divergence of this.

    \[{\mathop{\rm div}\nolimits} \left( {{\mathop{\rm curl}\nolimits} \vec F} \right) = \frac{\partial }{{\partial x}}\left( z \right) + \frac{\partial }{{\partial y}}\left( {2yz} \right) + \frac{\partial }{{\partial z}}\left( {y - {z^2}} \right) = 2z - 2z = 0\]

    We also have a physical interpretation of the divergence. If we again think of \(\vec F\) as the velocity field of a flowing fluid then \({\mathop{\rm div}\nolimits} \vec F\) represents the net rate of change of the mass of the fluid flowing from the point \(\left( {x,y,z} \right)\) per unit volume. This can also be thought of as the tendency of a fluid to diverge from a point. If \({\mathop{\rm div}\nolimits} \vec F = 0\) then the \(\vec F\) is called incompressible.

    The next topic that we want to briefly mention is the Laplace operator. Let’s first take a look at,

    \[{\mathop{\rm div}\nolimits} \left( {\nabla f} \right) = \nabla \centerdot \nabla f = {f_{xx}} + {f_{yy}} + {f_{zz}}\]

    The Laplace operator is then defined as,

    \[{\nabla ^2} = \nabla \centerdot \nabla \]

    The Laplace operator arises naturally in many fields including heat transfer and fluid flow.

    The final topic in this section is to give two vector forms of Green’s Theorem. The first form uses the curl of the vector field and is,

    \[\oint_{C}{{\vec F\centerdot d\,\vec r}} = \iint\limits_{D}{{\left( {{\mathop{\rm curl}\nolimits} \vec F} \right)\centerdot \vec k\,dA}}\]

    where \(\vec k\) is the standard unit vector in the positive \(z\) direction.

    The second form uses the divergence. In this case we also need the outward unit normal to the curve \(C\). If the curve is parameterized by

    \[\vec r\left( t \right) = x\left( t \right)\vec i + y\left( t \right)\vec j\]

    then the outward unit normal is given by,

    \[\vec n = \frac{{y'\left( t \right)}}{{\left\| {\vec r'\left( t \right)} \right\|}}\vec i - \frac{{x'\left( t \right)}}{{\left\| {\vec r'\left( t \right)} \right\|}}\vec j\]

    Here is a sketch illustrating the outward unit normal for some curve \(C\) at various points.

    This is the 2D graph, without an axis system, of a generic curve.  The curve is nearly rectangular except that the corners are rounded and the middle of the top “edge” dips down about 1/3 of the way into the interior.  The curve is labeled C and there are arrow heads on the curve indicating that the curve is traced out in a counter clockwise direction.  At various points on the curve there are vectors that start on the curve and point way from the enclosed region.  Each of these indicate the outward unit normal vectors to the curve at these points.

    The vector form of Green’s Theorem that uses the divergence is given by,

    \[\oint_{C}{{\vec F\centerdot \vec n\,ds}} = \iint\limits_{D}{{{\mathop{\rm div}\nolimits} \vec F\,dA}}\]
    亚洲欧美中文日韩视频 - 视频 - 在线观看 - 影视资讯 - av网 <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <蜘蛛词>| <文本链> <文本链> <文本链> <文本链> <文本链> <文本链>