I apologize for the outage on the site yesterday and today. Lamar University is in Beaumont Texas and Hurricane Laura came through here and caused a brief power outage at Lamar. Things should be up and running at this point and (hopefully) will stay that way, at least until the next hurricane comes through here which seems to happen about once every 10-15 years. Note that I wouldn't be too suprised if there are brief outages over the next couple of days as they work to get everything back up and running properly. I apologize for the inconvienence.

Paul

August 27, 2020

*i.e.*you are probably on a mobile phone). Due to the nature of the mathematics on this site it is best views in landscape mode. If your device is not in landscape mode many of the equations will run off the side of your device (should be able to scroll to see them) and some of the menu items will be cut off due to the narrow screen width.

### Section 3-5 : Reduction of Order

We’re now going to take a brief detour and look at solutions to non-constant coefficient, second order differential equations of the form.

\[p\left( t \right)y'' + q\left( t \right)y' + r\left( t \right)y = 0\]In general, finding solutions to these kinds of differential equations can be much more difficult than finding solutions to constant coefficient differential equations. However, if we already know one solution to the differential equation we can use the method that we used in the last section to find a second solution. This method is called **reduction of order**.

Let’s take a quick look at an example to see how this is done.

given that \(y_{1}(t)=t^{-1}\) is a solution.

Reduction of order requires that a solution already be known. Without this known solution we won’t be able to do reduction of order.

Once we have this first solution we will then assume that a second solution will have the form

\[\begin{equation}{y_2}\left( t \right) = v\left( t \right){y_1}\left( t \right)\label{eq:eq1}\end{equation}\]for a proper choice of \(v(t)\). To determine the proper choice, we plug the guess into the differential equation and get a new differential equation that can be solved for \(v(t)\).

So, let’s do that for this problem. Here is the form of the second solution as well as the derivatives that we’ll need.

\[{y_2}\left( t \right) = {t^{ - 1}}v\hspace{0.25in}{y'_2}\left( t \right) = - {t^{ - 2}}v + {t^{ - 1}}v'\hspace{0.25in}{y''_2}\left( t \right) = 2{t^{ - 3}}v - 2{t^{ - 2}}v' + {t^{ - 1}}v''\]Plugging these into the differential equation gives

\[2{t^2}\left( {2{t^{ - 3}}v - 2{t^{ - 2}}v' + {t^{ - 1}}v''} \right) + t\left( { - {t^{ - 2}}v + {t^{ - 1}}v'} \right) - 3\left( {{t^{ - 1}}v} \right) = 0\]Rearranging and simplifying gives

\[\begin{align*}2tv'' + \left( { - 4 + 1} \right)v' + \left( {4{t^{ - 1}} - {t^{ - 1}} - 3{t^{ - 1}}} \right)v & = 0\\ 2tv'' - 3v' & = 0\end{align*}\]Note that upon simplifying the only terms remaining are those involving the derivatives of \(v\). The term involving \(v\) drops out. If you’ve done all of your work correctly this should always happen. Sometimes, as in the repeated roots case, the first derivative term will also drop out.

So, in order for \(\eqref{eq:eq1}\) to be a solution then \(v\) must satisfy

\[\begin{equation}2tv'' - 3v' = 0\label{eq:eq2}\end{equation}\]This appears to be a problem. In order to find a solution to a second order non-constant coefficient differential equation we need to solve a different second order non-constant coefficient differential equation.

However, this isn’t the problem that it appears to be. Because the term involving the \(v\) drops out we can actually solve \(\eqref{eq:eq2}\) and we can do it with the knowledge that we already have at this point. We will solve this by making the following **change of variable**.

With this change of variable \(\eqref{eq:eq2}\) becomes

\[2tw' - 3w = 0\]and this is a linear, first order differential equation that we can solve. This also explains the name of this method. We’ve managed to reduce a second order differential equation down to a first order differential equation.

This is a fairly simple first order differential equation so I’ll leave the details of the solving to you. If you need a refresher on solving linear, first order differential equations go back to the second chapter and check out that section. The solution to this differential equation is

\[w\left( t \right) = c\,{t^{\frac{3}{2}}}\]Now, this is not quite what we were after. We are after a solution to \(\eqref{eq:eq2}\). However, we can now find this. Recall our change of variable.

\[v' = w\]With this we can easily solve for \(v(t)\).

\[v\left( t \right) = \int{{w\,dt}} = \int{{c{t^{\frac{3}{2}}}\,dt}} = \frac{2}{5}c{t^{\frac{5}{2}}} + k\]This is the most general possible \(v(t)\) that we can use to get a second solution. So, just as we did in the repeated roots section, we can choose the constants to be anything we want so choose them to clear out all the extraneous constants. In this case we can use

\[c = \frac{5}{2}\hspace{0.25in}k = 0\]Using these gives the following for \(v(t)\) and for the second solution.

\[v\left( t \right) = {t^{\frac{5}{2}}}\hspace{0.25in} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.25in}{y_2}\left( t \right) = {t^{ - 1}}\left( {{t^{\frac{5}{2}}}} \right) = {t^{\frac{3}{2}}}\]Then general solution will then be,

\[y\left( t \right) = {c_1}{t^{ - 1}} + {c_2}{t^{\frac{3}{2}}}\]If we had been given initial conditions we could then differentiate, apply the initial conditions and solve for the constants.

Reduction of order, the method used in the previous example can be used to find second solutions to differential equations. However, this does require that we already have a solution and often finding that first solution is a very difficult task and often in the process of finding the first solution you will also get the second solution without needing to resort to reduction of order. So, for those cases when we do have a first solution this is a nice method for getting a second solution.

Let’s do one more example.

given that \({y_1}\left( t \right) = t\) is a solution.

The form for the second solution as well as its derivatives are,

\[{y_2}\left( t \right) = tv\hspace{0.25in}{y'_2}\left( t \right) = v + tv'\hspace{0.25in}{y''_2}\left( t \right) = 2v' + tv''\]Plugging these into the differential equation gives,

\[{t^2}\left( {2v' + tv''} \right) + 2t\left( {v + tv'} \right) - 2\left( {tv} \right) = 0 = 0\]Rearranging and simplifying gives the differential equation that we’ll need to solve in order to determine the correct \(v\) that we’ll need for the second solution.

\[{t^3}v'' + 4{t^2}v' = 0\]Next use the variable transformation as we did in the previous example.

\[w = v'\hspace{0.25in} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.25in}w' = v''\]With this change of variable the differential equation becomes

\[{t^3}w' + 4{t^2}w = 0\]and this is a linear, first order differential equation that we can solve. We’ll leave the details of the solution process to you.

\[w\left( t \right) = c\,{t^{ - 4}}\]Now solve for \(v(t)\).

\[v\left( t \right) = \int{{w\,dt}} = \int{{c{t^{ - 4}}\,dt}} = - \frac{1}{3}c{t^{ - 3}} + k\]As with the first example we’ll drop the constants and use the following \(v(t)\)

\[v\left( t \right) = {t^{ - 3}}\hspace{0.25in} \Rightarrow \hspace{0.25in}{y_2}\left( t \right) = t\left( {{t^{ - 3}}} \right) = {t^{ - 2}}\]Then general solution will then be,

\[y\left( t \right) = {c_1}t + \frac{{{c_2}}}{{{t^2}}}\]On a side note, both of the differential equations in this section were of the form,

\[{t^2}y'' + \alpha \,t\,y' + \beta y = 0\]These are called Euler differential equations and are fairly simple to solve directly for both solutions. To see how to solve these directly take a look at the Euler Differential Equation section.